订单数据源数据速度优化
This commit is contained in:
@@ -728,10 +728,26 @@ public class TabOrderMonitorService
|
||||
return s == null ? "" : s;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** 已排序主键的内存分页切片,并按切片顺序回查明细(VO)。 */
|
||||
/** 已排序主键的内存分页切片,并按切片顺序回查明细(VO)。
|
||||
* 列表页只需展示列:走窄列 ListByIds,避免公网传输 o.* 全行宽表(同步专用)拖慢列表。 */
|
||||
private List<TabOrderMonitorVo> doPageByKeys(String table, List<MatchedOrderKey> orderedKeys, int pn, int ps)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return toVoList(doRowsByKeys(table, orderedKeys, pn, ps));
|
||||
if (orderedKeys == null || orderedKeys.isEmpty())
|
||||
{
|
||||
return Collections.emptyList();
|
||||
}
|
||||
int from = (pn - 1) * ps;
|
||||
if (from >= orderedKeys.size())
|
||||
{
|
||||
return Collections.emptyList();
|
||||
}
|
||||
List<MatchedOrderKey> slice = orderedKeys.subList(from, Math.min(from + ps, orderedKeys.size()));
|
||||
List<String> ids = new ArrayList<String>(slice.size());
|
||||
for (MatchedOrderKey key : slice)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ids.add(key.getId());
|
||||
}
|
||||
return loadListVosByIds(table, ids);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** 已排序主键的内存分页切片,按切片顺序回查全行(VO + Oracle 原始行)。 */
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -58,10 +58,13 @@ PUBLIC "-//mybatis.org//DTD Mapper 3.0//EN"
|
||||
1 = 1
|
||||
</if>
|
||||
<if test="query.beginTime != null and query.beginTime != ''">
|
||||
AND o.PICKUP_DATE >= TO_TIMESTAMP(#{query.beginTime}, 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS')
|
||||
<!-- PICKUP_DATE 是 DATE 列:必须用 TO_DATE 比较;TO_TIMESTAMP 会触发
|
||||
INTERNAL_FUNCTION(列) 使 (CUSTOMER_CODE, PICKUP_DATE) 复合索引失效,
|
||||
客户+提货时间查询从 1s 恶化到 200s+ -->
|
||||
AND o.PICKUP_DATE >= TO_DATE(#{query.beginTime}, 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS')
|
||||
</if>
|
||||
<if test="query.endTime != null and query.endTime != ''">
|
||||
AND o.PICKUP_DATE <= TO_TIMESTAMP(#{query.endTime}, 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS')
|
||||
AND o.PICKUP_DATE <= TO_DATE(#{query.endTime}, 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS')
|
||||
</if>
|
||||
AND o.BL_PICKUP = 1
|
||||
AND o.ORDER_STATUS IN (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11)
|
||||
@@ -135,11 +138,12 @@ PUBLIC "-//mybatis.org//DTD Mapper 3.0//EN"
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
Month-range list: sort only narrow keys, then Java loads display/full rows by ID.
|
||||
Avoids ORDER BY on o.* which gets very slow when pickup window is ~1 month.
|
||||
TO_DATE 比较(勿改回 TO_TIMESTAMP):索引可 sargable 走 (CUSTOMER_CODE, PICKUP_DATE) 复合索引。
|
||||
-->
|
||||
<select id="selectTabOrderMonitorKeyPage" resultType="java.util.HashMap">
|
||||
SELECT ID FROM (
|
||||
SELECT inner_q.ID AS ID, ROWNUM AS rn FROM (
|
||||
SELECT /*+ FIRST_ROWS(${endRow}) */ o.ID, o.PICKUP_DATE, o.ORDER_ID
|
||||
SELECT o.ID, o.PICKUP_DATE, o.ORDER_ID
|
||||
FROM ${orderTable} o
|
||||
WHERE
|
||||
<include refid="tabOrderMonitorWhere"/>
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user